|
|
Rank: Advanced Member  Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/8/2011 Posts: 461
|
[quote=MercMan]Still puts us in about last place out of states that consistently produce Booners. http://www.bowhuntingmag...state-or-province-fall/[/quote] That's interesting....Maryland, Maine, Mass, and Rhode Island had more entries than Louisiana...I never would've thought that.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member  Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/9/2010 Posts: 449 Location: you can't get there from here
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member  Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/25/2010 Posts: 1,880
|
buck from moorehead, will rives new buck, 2 from carrol county that I saw pics of that will probably net 170. Yall go back through the threads and you will be surpised at how many we have seen on here alone. We are a very small number compared to hunters statewide, so these numbers are not surprising at all.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member  Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/9/2010 Posts: 449 Location: you can't get there from here
|
check out my previous post. MDWFP lays out the number in the news letter
2011 Brought Big Bucks for Mississippi The early spring that occurred in 2011 was kind to many Mississippi deer hunters. William T. McKinley, Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks (MDWFP) Deer Program Biologist said, “Recent research has shown that an early spring green-up allows deer more time to recover from the stress of the rut and cold winter, which helps deer devote more energy to body and antler growth.” Deer management zones, along with antler criteria that began in 2010, and the concept of quality deer management are resulting in many hunters observing more mature bucks on their properties. This combination of sound deer management and increased nutrition has resulted in numerous reports of record class bucks, 160” or better, across Mississippi. At this time, 64 bucks, scoring better than 160 Boone and Crockett inches, have been reported in the following counties: Adams, Chickasaw, Carroll, Clarke, Clay, Coahoma, Holmes, Humphreys, Issaquena, Jasper, Jefferson, Jeff Davis, Jones, Lauderdale, Leake, Leflore, Lowndes, Madison, Monroe, Noxubee, Pike, Rankin, Sharkey, Sunflower, Tunica, Warren, Webster, Winston, and Yazoo. Of these, 41 bucks scored greater than 170”, 25 scored greater than 180”, 8 scored greater than 190”, and 3 scored over 200”. Most of these scores are not official, as the required 60-day drying time has not elapsed.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member  Groups: Premium, Registered, Seed Coordinator Joined: 2/26/2010 Posts: 2,762
|
This one scored 180 gross 
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member  Groups: Premium, Registered, Seed Coordinator Joined: 2/26/2010 Posts: 2,762
|
This one was close 168, but both were killed off the same stand, about 100 yards off my property line, figures, ha. 
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Yazoo Coop
Joined: 11/17/2010 Posts: 163 Location: HIlls
|
Gibow,
That first one might make it. Let me know and we will add it on the list.
We are going to have another early green up this year.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member  Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/26/2010 Posts: 1,164
|
One thing to consider is number of hunters in those states.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/6/2011 Posts: 13
|
Here is nice buck killed in prairie. Grossed 177 
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member  Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/22/2011 Posts: 948 Location: south miss.
|
Something else to think about I use to hunt in SW Kansas and I know of a good many potential B&C bucks killed around there that were never submitted into the B&C records. I am sure that happens alot so those Midwestern states are producing more big bucks than records show. I have to agree with mercman ms is still pretty low list.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Yazoo Coop
Joined: 11/17/2010 Posts: 163 Location: HIlls
|
Good points about not entering them into the book. I have several P&Y deer that I will never enter.
I dont know what it is about the net 170 but so many bucks gross way over that mark but seem to fall short by just inches. The net 170/195 is very hard to achieve for a MS whitetail.
That brings up a few points:
>We should remember we are hunting a different sub species than what grows in the midwest. i.e I don't think a coues deer (1 of 27 whitetail subspecies) will ever dream of netting 170.
>(It's all relative) We could figure out how a MS whitetail compares to Midwest if you took an avg. of our top say 100 scoring deer compared over a 5 year period to a midwest state's top 100 deer. That would be an avg. vs avg. and would really put things in perspective. It would be a moving avg. but would really show a states increase or decline relative to each other.
>MS could improve drastically from where it is today. I am doing my part to make it better and believe the younger generation is onto something.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/5/2012 Posts: 87 Location: In a tree or boat
|
Any additions to the B&C list after drying? Or did everyone decide not to advertise in hopes of keeping lease prices from going through the roof?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Premium, Registered
Joined: 2/25/2010 Posts: 435
|
All this hoopla about the bigger bucks and getting into "The Book" while at the same time they still say the management plans are in no way "trophy" management. YEAH RIGHT!! Big pile of fresh BS.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member  Groups: Premium, Registered Joined: 2/25/2010 Posts: 2,388
|
I know of a 192" that was killed in Tunica county this year. I have pics of it somewhere.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member  Groups: Premium, Registered Joined: 2/25/2010 Posts: 318
|
Im pretty sure that many people do not report what they are killing. I have the pic of a deer my neighbor killed this year and it scores 170 typical. Its also in a county not listed in this thread.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Yazoo Coop
Joined: 2/25/2010 Posts: 89
|
Its not about "trophy" management.. Its about age management.. The trophy, or horns, or whatever else comes sometimes as a by-product of allowing deer to get a little more age on them. "Trophy" management would include genetic manipulation etc.. I am tryin to take steps towards having our members not look at the horns.. Judge the deer on their body.. If its a 200lb or 4 yr old spike.. shoot it. The trophy and the horns are all by products of a deer getting a little age on em... And I think 90% of the programs in MS have this desired goal.. to let deer mature bucmeister wrote:All this hoopla about the bigger bucks and getting into "The Book" while at the same time they still say the management plans are in no way "trophy" management. YEAH RIGHT!! Big pile of fresh BS.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member  Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/25/2010 Posts: 838
|
What is impressive is the top 2 and the top 10 on the list.Incredible what those states produce.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Premium, Registered
Joined: 2/25/2010 Posts: 435
|
jmayfield wrote:Its not about "trophy" management.. Its about age management.. The trophy, or horns, or whatever else comes sometimes as a by-product of allowing deer to get a little more age on them. "Trophy" management would include genetic manipulation etc.. I am tryin to take steps towards having our members not look at the horns.. Judge the deer on their body.. If its a 200lb or 4 yr old spike.. shoot it. The trophy and the horns are all by products of a deer getting a little age on em... And I think 90% of the programs in MS have this desired goal.. to let deer mature Well, I still have my reservations about the ultimate intent and in our area the quality of the result is seriously in question. I think it is as much of a working trophy plan as they can come up with for a wild statewide herd, but be that as it may we surely never see old bucks posted with sorry racks do we, nor do we see statements about the age and weight while ignoring the rack. I know and hear what is being said, I'm just watching and judging what is being done.
|
|
|
Rank: Administration  Groups: Administrators
Joined: 2/1/2011 Posts: 1,816 Location: Madison
|
jmayfield wrote:Its not about "trophy" management.. Its about age management..
I couldn't agree more Mayfield. Very little difference between deer management and the latest diet or exercise fad. What do you really think you are going to do to a deer in a few years compared to the million or so its taken mother nature. Its  IMHO. You want big deer then let them get some age. Or get you a high fence and genetically manipulate them. Don't confuse "deer management" with habitat management.
|
|
|