Competition Sponsors

Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

2 Pages <12
MS #17 ranking with 39 B&C in 5 years Options
SNOT
#26 Posted : Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:29:30 PM
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered

Joined: 7/8/2011
Posts: 461
[quote=MercMan]Still puts us in about last place out of states that consistently produce Booners.

http://www.bowhuntingmag...state-or-province-fall/[/quote]


That's interesting....Maryland, Maine, Mass, and Rhode Island had more entries than Louisiana...I never would've thought that.
A-game
#27 Posted : Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:17:32 PM
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered

Joined: 11/9/2010
Posts: 449
Location: you can't get there from here
tombstone
#28 Posted : Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:48:03 PM
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered

Joined: 2/25/2010
Posts: 1,880
buck from moorehead, will rives new buck, 2 from carrol county that I saw pics of that will probably net 170. Yall go back through the threads and you will be surpised at how many we have seen on here alone. We are a very small number compared to hunters statewide, so these numbers are not surprising at all.
A-game
#29 Posted : Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:54:54 PM
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered

Joined: 11/9/2010
Posts: 449
Location: you can't get there from here
check out my previous post. MDWFP lays out the number in the news letter

2011 Brought Big Bucks for Mississippi

The early spring that occurred in 2011 was kind to many Mississippi deer hunters. William T. McKinley, Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks (MDWFP) Deer Program Biologist said, “Recent research has shown that an early spring green-up allows deer more time to recover from the stress of the rut and cold winter, which helps deer devote more energy to body and antler growth.”

Deer management zones, along with antler criteria that began in 2010, and the concept of quality deer management are resulting in many hunters observing more mature bucks on their properties.

This combination of sound deer management and increased nutrition has resulted in numerous reports of record class bucks, 160” or better, across Mississippi. At this time, 64 bucks, scoring better than 160 Boone and Crockett inches, have been reported in the following counties: Adams, Chickasaw, Carroll, Clarke, Clay, Coahoma, Holmes, Humphreys, Issaquena, Jasper, Jefferson, Jeff Davis, Jones, Lauderdale, Leake, Leflore, Lowndes, Madison, Monroe, Noxubee, Pike, Rankin, Sharkey, Sunflower, Tunica, Warren, Webster, Winston, and Yazoo. Of these, 41 bucks scored greater than 170”, 25 scored greater than 180”, 8 scored greater than 190”, and 3 scored over 200”. Most of these scores are not official, as the required 60-day drying time has not elapsed.
gibowhunter
#30 Posted : Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:05:04 PM
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Premium, Registered, Seed Coordinator

Joined: 2/26/2010
Posts: 2,762
This one scored 180 gross
gibowhunter
#31 Posted : Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:09:42 PM
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Premium, Registered, Seed Coordinator

Joined: 2/26/2010
Posts: 2,762
This one was close 168, but both were killed off the same stand, about 100 yards off my property line, figures, ha.
HILL31
#32 Posted : Wednesday, February 01, 2012 6:58:19 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Yazoo Coop

Joined: 11/17/2010
Posts: 163
Location: HIlls
Gibow,

That first one might make it. Let me know and we will add it on the list.

We are going to have another early green up this year.
W
#33 Posted : Wednesday, February 01, 2012 7:52:56 PM
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered

Joined: 2/26/2010
Posts: 1,164
One thing to consider is number of hunters in those states.
jjbean10
#34 Posted : Friday, February 03, 2012 12:10:15 AM
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered

Joined: 6/6/2011
Posts: 13
Here is nice buck killed in prairie. Grossed 177
Deepsouth
#35 Posted : Friday, February 03, 2012 7:24:44 AM
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered

Joined: 10/22/2011
Posts: 948
Location: south miss.
Something else to think about I use to hunt in SW Kansas and I know of a good many potential B&C bucks killed around there that were never submitted into the B&C records. I am sure that happens alot so those Midwestern states are producing more big bucks than records show. I have to agree with mercman ms is still pretty low list.
HILL31
#36 Posted : Friday, February 03, 2012 12:47:55 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Yazoo Coop

Joined: 11/17/2010
Posts: 163
Location: HIlls
Good points about not entering them into the book. I have several P&Y deer that I will never enter.

I dont know what it is about the net 170 but so many bucks gross way over that mark but seem to fall short by just inches. The net 170/195 is very hard to achieve for a MS whitetail.

That brings up a few points:

>We should remember we are hunting a different sub species than what grows in the midwest. i.e I don't think a coues deer (1 of 27 whitetail subspecies) will ever dream of netting 170.

>(It's all relative) We could figure out how a MS whitetail compares to Midwest if you took an avg. of our top say 100 scoring deer compared over a 5 year period to a midwest state's top 100 deer. That would be an avg. vs avg. and would really put things in perspective. It would be a moving avg. but would really show a states increase or decline relative to each other.

>MS could improve drastically from where it is today. I am doing my part to make it better and believe the younger generation is onto something.
hopper
#37 Posted : Wednesday, February 22, 2012 11:37:50 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered

Joined: 1/5/2012
Posts: 87
Location: In a tree or boat
Any additions to the B&C list after drying? Or did everyone decide not to advertise in hopes of keeping lease prices from going through the roof?
bucmeister
#38 Posted : Wednesday, February 22, 2012 1:24:46 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Premium, Registered

Joined: 2/25/2010
Posts: 435
All this hoopla about the bigger bucks and getting into "The Book" while at the same time they still say the management plans are in no way "trophy" management. YEAH RIGHT!! Big pile of fresh BS.
olemossyhorns
#39 Posted : Wednesday, February 22, 2012 1:29:37 PM
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Premium, Registered

Joined: 2/25/2010
Posts: 2,388
I know of a 192" that was killed in Tunica county this year. I have pics of it somewhere.
7 Point E
#40 Posted : Wednesday, February 22, 2012 2:04:55 PM
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Premium, Registered

Joined: 2/25/2010
Posts: 318
Im pretty sure that many people do not report what they are killing. I have the pic of a deer my neighbor killed this year and it scores 170 typical. Its also in a county not listed in this thread.
jmayfield
#41 Posted : Wednesday, February 22, 2012 5:46:35 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Yazoo Coop

Joined: 2/25/2010
Posts: 89
Its not about "trophy" management.. Its about age management.. The trophy, or horns, or whatever else comes sometimes as a by-product of allowing deer to get a little more age on them. "Trophy" management would include genetic manipulation etc.. I am tryin to take steps towards having our members not look at the horns.. Judge the deer on their body.. If its a 200lb or 4 yr old spike.. shoot it. The trophy and the horns are all by products of a deer getting a little age on em... And I think 90% of the programs in MS have this desired goal.. to let deer mature



bucmeister wrote:
All this hoopla about the bigger bucks and getting into "The Book" while at the same time they still say the management plans are in no way "trophy" management. YEAH RIGHT!! Big pile of fresh BS.

Roll_Tide
#42 Posted : Thursday, February 23, 2012 3:19:24 AM
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered

Joined: 2/25/2010
Posts: 838
What is impressive is the top 2 and the top 10 on the list.Incredible what those states produce.
bucmeister
#43 Posted : Thursday, February 23, 2012 7:57:32 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Premium, Registered

Joined: 2/25/2010
Posts: 435
jmayfield wrote:
Its not about "trophy" management.. Its about age management.. The trophy, or horns, or whatever else comes sometimes as a by-product of allowing deer to get a little more age on them. "Trophy" management would include genetic manipulation etc.. I am tryin to take steps towards having our members not look at the horns.. Judge the deer on their body.. If its a 200lb or 4 yr old spike.. shoot it. The trophy and the horns are all by products of a deer getting a little age on em... And I think 90% of the programs in MS have this desired goal.. to let deer mature


Well, I still have my reservations about the ultimate intent and in our area the quality of the result is seriously in question. I think it is as much of a working trophy plan as they can come up with for a wild statewide herd, but be that as it may we surely never see old bucks posted with sorry racks do we, nor do we see statements about the age and weight while ignoring the rack. I know and hear what is being said, I'm just watching and judging what is being done.
gvirden
#44 Posted : Thursday, February 23, 2012 10:27:47 AM
Rank: Administration

Groups: Administrators

Joined: 2/1/2011
Posts: 1,816
Location: Madison
jmayfield wrote:
Its not about "trophy" management.. Its about age management..


I couldn't agree more Mayfield. Very little difference between deer management and the latest diet or exercise fad. What do you really think you are going to do to a deer in a few years compared to the million or so its taken mother nature. Its ROFL IMHO. You want big deer then let them get some age. Or get you a high fence and genetically manipulate them.

Don't confuse "deer management" with habitat management.


2 Pages <12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.