I understand what your saying. Improving your habitat will result in the best herd density for sure. I will even consider putting out a gravity feeder on my place this next year; but I'm likely the only guy in Mississippi that's going to use it year 'round without a stand even remotely close to it. It's just another habitat building block on making my own property the best it can be. I'm planning on planting 100 sawtooth oaks this month to make a contribution for the habitat in future years.
Like you, I don't see baiting (in most cases) doing too much more than serving a self benefit for the purpose of killing a deer. I think you harvest more deer than without it; but that incremental harvest has a detriment to the overall future of hunting on a specific property. To each his own as its legal and nobody is forced to resort to that kind of thing if they don't want to. I just would prefer a non-baiting arrangement if I can find it. I think people bait when their herd density is less than what they want it to be to see and kill more deer. I think it just excerbates a herd density problem which is probably the result on your own area observations.
Like you, I don't see baiting (in most cases) doing too much more than serving a self benefit for the purpose of killing a deer. I think you harvest more deer than without it; but that incremental harvest has a detriment to the overall future of hunting on a specific property. To each his own as its legal and nobody is forced to resort to that kind of thing if they don't want to. I just would prefer a non-baiting arrangement if I can find it. I think people bait when their herd density is less than what they want it to be to see and kill more deer. I think it just excerbates a herd density problem which is probably the result on your own area observations.